First there was no gert queues for attention in the Welsh National Health.
Then the boffins said that there are less nasty hospital infections of deadly deceases in Wales than England.
Today they say that the car parks are free in Walsh hospitals or hysbyty in Welsh.
So the what I bin thinkin is that everone in England who is ill or have anyone ill go to Wales things are better there.
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Monday, March 03, 2008
This is comments from the article: "Cry 'God for Harry, England and St George'"
Henk Ruyssenaars Homepage 03.02.08 - 6:09 am #
Now this is what he says he said in 2006:
"FPF - July 20, 2006 - After having followed the stream of information - based on reality - coming out of Lebanon, and comparing it to the broadcasts and information given by the major mainstream media, like the BBC and other war advocating networks, I can NOT understand why any sane person - in Lebanon for instance - would ever collaborate with those despicable jerks and dish-bitches. They sell wars, and are megaphones of those making the wars. They help to destroy you and your country.
I HAVE NEVER LET DOWN A 'REAL' COLLEAGUE, but those vile creatures are no 'journalist colleagues': they are all liars and Judas's that have sold themselves to the highest bidder. They are traitors to us all and dangerous to mankind. Get their names and check via Internet what they say and write. Depending on that information - not what they tell you - let them stay or get very fast rid of them.
BUT DO NOT HARM THEM: THAT WOULD MEAN TO STOOP AS LOW AS THEY ARE.
THEY ARE NOT JOURNALISTS: THEY ARE WARMONGERING PROPAGANDISTS.
For the past 4 decades I've been an independent foreign correspondent, also for 10 years in North-Africa and the Middle East. And, what I daily can see on for instance the BBC, CNN, FOX, German and Dutch TV is purely a falsification of reality. They lie through their teeth, and without exception mouth the Israeli war message, which is 'more through murder'.
Most of the interested people by now know that the BBC two decades ago openly started servicing the greedy goals and power of the people managing England: building their false empire at any cost to us others. They are the war criminals who put one of their 'front men' at the top of the BBC, Michael Grade. - [ http://tinyurl.com/l687f] - Within short honest journalism at the BBC was snuffed, and the war and killing machine rolls on, fueled by them."
Now what it says in that tiny url is this:
"Liberal Judaism welcomes the appointment of Michael Grade as Chairman of the BBC. Michael Grade is an active Liberal Jew who belongs to the Liberal Jewish Synagogue in St. Johns Wood. His appointment as Chairman of the BBC is the first time that a Liberal Jew has held such a uniquely important role within the UK media. Liberal Judaism desires that Judaism shall be an active force for good in the lives of Jewish individuals, families and communities today, and that it shall make its contribution to the betterment of human society. It confronts unflinchingly the challenges of our time, welcomes gladly all advances in human knowledge, and responds constructively to changing circumstances."
"I've said it before - and I should know - because I've worked for the BBC too, in English and German when they still knew what journalism was, and one could broadcast 'live'. Also during the Gulf War. No need denying: I still have the BBC paychecks. So, as a senior correspondent I recognize what they do, and it is absolutely hair raising and disgusting to hear and watch. Especially if you - like me - have been in Lebanon too.
ANY HUMAN BEING WITH DECENCY CAN NOT ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
There''s more and some good links at Url.: http://beirut.indymedia.org/ar/2...6/07/ 4620.shtml"
I do absolutely not see any reason why you should keep somebody around who attacks you with 98% of what they are saying. Take a grip, or talk to the undertaker.
GET RID OF THEM, BEFORE THEY GET RID OF YOU, AND YOUR COUNTRY.
"
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Henk Ruyssenaars Homepage 03.02.08 - 6:09 am #
Now this is what he says he said in 2006:
"FPF - July 20, 2006 - After having followed the stream of information - based on reality - coming out of Lebanon, and comparing it to the broadcasts and information given by the major mainstream media, like the BBC and other war advocating networks, I can NOT understand why any sane person - in Lebanon for instance - would ever collaborate with those despicable jerks and dish-bitches. They sell wars, and are megaphones of those making the wars. They help to destroy you and your country.
I HAVE NEVER LET DOWN A 'REAL' COLLEAGUE, but those vile creatures are no 'journalist colleagues': they are all liars and Judas's that have sold themselves to the highest bidder. They are traitors to us all and dangerous to mankind. Get their names and check via Internet what they say and write. Depending on that information - not what they tell you - let them stay or get very fast rid of them.
BUT DO NOT HARM THEM: THAT WOULD MEAN TO STOOP AS LOW AS THEY ARE.
THEY ARE NOT JOURNALISTS: THEY ARE WARMONGERING PROPAGANDISTS.
For the past 4 decades I've been an independent foreign correspondent, also for 10 years in North-Africa and the Middle East. And, what I daily can see on for instance the BBC, CNN, FOX, German and Dutch TV is purely a falsification of reality. They lie through their teeth, and without exception mouth the Israeli war message, which is 'more through murder'.
Most of the interested people by now know that the BBC two decades ago openly started servicing the greedy goals and power of the people managing England: building their false empire at any cost to us others. They are the war criminals who put one of their 'front men' at the top of the BBC, Michael Grade. - [ http://tinyurl.com/l687f] - Within short honest journalism at the BBC was snuffed, and the war and killing machine rolls on, fueled by them."
Now what it says in that tiny url is this:
"Liberal Judaism welcomes the appointment of Michael Grade as Chairman of the BBC. Michael Grade is an active Liberal Jew who belongs to the Liberal Jewish Synagogue in St. Johns Wood. His appointment as Chairman of the BBC is the first time that a Liberal Jew has held such a uniquely important role within the UK media. Liberal Judaism desires that Judaism shall be an active force for good in the lives of Jewish individuals, families and communities today, and that it shall make its contribution to the betterment of human society. It confronts unflinchingly the challenges of our time, welcomes gladly all advances in human knowledge, and responds constructively to changing circumstances."
"I've said it before - and I should know - because I've worked for the BBC too, in English and German when they still knew what journalism was, and one could broadcast 'live'. Also during the Gulf War. No need denying: I still have the BBC paychecks. So, as a senior correspondent I recognize what they do, and it is absolutely hair raising and disgusting to hear and watch. Especially if you - like me - have been in Lebanon too.
ANY HUMAN BEING WITH DECENCY CAN NOT ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
There''s more and some good links at Url.: http://beirut.indymedia.org/ar/2...6/07/ 4620.shtml"
I do absolutely not see any reason why you should keep somebody around who attacks you with 98% of what they are saying. Take a grip, or talk to the undertaker.
GET RID OF THEM, BEFORE THEY GET RID OF YOU, AND YOUR COUNTRY.
"
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Long Live Prince 'Arry
Oh man the amount of suffering I had just listening to the BBC News for a week about my man Harry and his "bravado" was well noticed. I switched off the frigging TV for a day or two to escape it. I thought I was a bit nasty to think like that as lots of British people think otherwise. You see I am easily lead and wants to keep my innocence. Now I read Mr Galloway ranting about it, and feel a bit better. I will put his rant here as he will not mind me publishing it... I hope and ....But do go to the comments section and see the amount of people who agree on what he says is very .....interesting to go on and say things like I Bin Thinkin.
Hguhrumph.... See this for a bit of entertaintment from the Commnts:
" The Black Watch today, asked Jean: they were the British regiment selected to take a ritualistic part in the Fallujah slaughter to celebrate Bush's win in 04 (and Kerry's surrender). The Balck Watch secured the southern perimeter of the city while the Marines slaughtered the men and boys.
As to Prince Harry: interestingly his job was forward air controller. That is to say he called up the Air Force to bomb Afghan villages. A true hero!
chris harries | 03.01.08 - 7:07"
Here I can take you to another world in the internet.
"Cry 'God for Harry, England and St George'
In their acclaim for this new Prince Hal, the media have once again made themselves the useful idiots of disastrous military adventurism
By George Galloway
01/03/08 "The Guardian" -- - As the peerless John Pilger put it, the invasion of Iraq would have been impossible without the supine connivance of the British media. The BBC was as much a part of operations as the Black Watch.
Five years on and a further instance of the kind of collusion that embeds journalism in the sewer of state spin. Peter Wilby says the media were "suckered", but that's a charitable view.
The case for the media keeping mum about Prince Harry's deployment to Afghanistan is straightforward enough - protecting not only his security but that of those around him. If that were all there was to it, then there would be little to consider, except the extraordinary double standard of the British media, which means that some people's safety and privacy is deemed worthy of protection and others' not.
But a moment's thought should puncture the gushing, sentimental story of the media and the MoD uniting in the national interest - reporters and royalty, prince and paparazzi standing together against a common foe.
At the very least, news of this collusion has made life very difficult for reporters, especially conscientious ones, in the BBC and other news organisations. Many people across the world already believed the BBC to be complicit in the British government's crimes of war. Now the corporation has acknowledged that it colluded with the state to suppress and manipulate the news.
How will that improve the standing of British correspondents abroad? Or their safety.
But collusion certainly didn't end there. The media is ever a hungry beast, and it was inconceivable that it would fast for three months without the promise of bacchanalian orgy at the end of it.
And so the flipside of 10 weeks of radio silence is wall-to-wall Harry, as the pin-up of the armed forces, one of the lads, full of derring-do, a British hero on Afghanistan's plains straight out of Tennyson or Kipling.
For a military adventure which, now, even the US's senior intelligence officer concedes is staring into the abyss, this could not have come at a better time.
Over the last few months, I've asked at public meetings, on my radio show and on walkabouts, why people think we are in Afghanistan, what would define the "victory" which would allow us to withdraw with laurels. Our ambassador in Kabul - a double-barrel who might also have walked out of 19th-century page - says we are going to be there for 30 or 40 years.
Other countries, wisely, are none too phlegmatic about that prospect. Condoleezza Rice's last visit to Europe was part of the US's effort to put pressure on other Nato counties to commit more troops to the Afghan quagmire.
Then comes the scoop of the young prince forsaking Boujis, despatched to that place beyond the Khyber pass by his sovereign grandmother, and enduring hardship with cheerful Tommy. There were naturally a few touches to bring it into this century - instead of fixing bayonets, we're informed he helped bring down air strikes with a handheld computer, which could easily pass for a video game; no Latin motto on his cap, instead a psychotic, dehumanised epigram that could have come from Travis in Taxi Driver: "We do bad things to bad people."
All sections of the establishment have gained from this superbly well-executed piece of theatre (incidentally, I'm not doubting Harry's personal bravery, it's just that that is not the issue): the army has a star; the BBC and Fleet Street appear to have a heart; and the royal family have a newfound source of capital at just the time that the circus that is the Diana inquest heaps more and more ordure in their direction. Out with the images of partying in a Nazi uniform, in with the young warrior who lost his mother when young but who has now grown up.
So the greatest collusion of all by the media is in perpetuating the myths of this war and in helping to craft the perfect recruitment poster.
It's better than Kitchener's "Your country needs you." Skilfully and chillingly, it speaks to this century and through the most modern media.
It is going to play an enduring role in prolonging this futile adventure, and perhaps starting others, in a country which British armies have three times before staggered out of in defeat, leaving so many of their number behind. No one, not even Alexander the Great has successfully occupied Afghanistan; and Harry, whatever you think about him, is certainly no Alexander the Great.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments "
Comments (100) Comment (0)
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Hguhrumph.... See this for a bit of entertaintment from the Commnts:
" The Black Watch today, asked Jean: they were the British regiment selected to take a ritualistic part in the Fallujah slaughter to celebrate Bush's win in 04 (and Kerry's surrender). The Balck Watch secured the southern perimeter of the city while the Marines slaughtered the men and boys.
As to Prince Harry: interestingly his job was forward air controller. That is to say he called up the Air Force to bomb Afghan villages. A true hero!
chris harries | 03.01.08 - 7:07"
Here I can take you to another world in the internet.
"Cry 'God for Harry, England and St George'
In their acclaim for this new Prince Hal, the media have once again made themselves the useful idiots of disastrous military adventurism
By George Galloway
01/03/08 "The Guardian" -- - As the peerless John Pilger put it, the invasion of Iraq would have been impossible without the supine connivance of the British media. The BBC was as much a part of operations as the Black Watch.
Five years on and a further instance of the kind of collusion that embeds journalism in the sewer of state spin. Peter Wilby says the media were "suckered", but that's a charitable view.
The case for the media keeping mum about Prince Harry's deployment to Afghanistan is straightforward enough - protecting not only his security but that of those around him. If that were all there was to it, then there would be little to consider, except the extraordinary double standard of the British media, which means that some people's safety and privacy is deemed worthy of protection and others' not.
But a moment's thought should puncture the gushing, sentimental story of the media and the MoD uniting in the national interest - reporters and royalty, prince and paparazzi standing together against a common foe.
At the very least, news of this collusion has made life very difficult for reporters, especially conscientious ones, in the BBC and other news organisations. Many people across the world already believed the BBC to be complicit in the British government's crimes of war. Now the corporation has acknowledged that it colluded with the state to suppress and manipulate the news.
How will that improve the standing of British correspondents abroad? Or their safety.
But collusion certainly didn't end there. The media is ever a hungry beast, and it was inconceivable that it would fast for three months without the promise of bacchanalian orgy at the end of it.
And so the flipside of 10 weeks of radio silence is wall-to-wall Harry, as the pin-up of the armed forces, one of the lads, full of derring-do, a British hero on Afghanistan's plains straight out of Tennyson or Kipling.
For a military adventure which, now, even the US's senior intelligence officer concedes is staring into the abyss, this could not have come at a better time.
Over the last few months, I've asked at public meetings, on my radio show and on walkabouts, why people think we are in Afghanistan, what would define the "victory" which would allow us to withdraw with laurels. Our ambassador in Kabul - a double-barrel who might also have walked out of 19th-century page - says we are going to be there for 30 or 40 years.
Other countries, wisely, are none too phlegmatic about that prospect. Condoleezza Rice's last visit to Europe was part of the US's effort to put pressure on other Nato counties to commit more troops to the Afghan quagmire.
Then comes the scoop of the young prince forsaking Boujis, despatched to that place beyond the Khyber pass by his sovereign grandmother, and enduring hardship with cheerful Tommy. There were naturally a few touches to bring it into this century - instead of fixing bayonets, we're informed he helped bring down air strikes with a handheld computer, which could easily pass for a video game; no Latin motto on his cap, instead a psychotic, dehumanised epigram that could have come from Travis in Taxi Driver: "We do bad things to bad people."
All sections of the establishment have gained from this superbly well-executed piece of theatre (incidentally, I'm not doubting Harry's personal bravery, it's just that that is not the issue): the army has a star; the BBC and Fleet Street appear to have a heart; and the royal family have a newfound source of capital at just the time that the circus that is the Diana inquest heaps more and more ordure in their direction. Out with the images of partying in a Nazi uniform, in with the young warrior who lost his mother when young but who has now grown up.
So the greatest collusion of all by the media is in perpetuating the myths of this war and in helping to craft the perfect recruitment poster.
It's better than Kitchener's "Your country needs you." Skilfully and chillingly, it speaks to this century and through the most modern media.
It is going to play an enduring role in prolonging this futile adventure, and perhaps starting others, in a country which British armies have three times before staggered out of in defeat, leaving so many of their number behind. No one, not even Alexander the Great has successfully occupied Afghanistan; and Harry, whatever you think about him, is certainly no Alexander the Great.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments "
Comments (100) Comment (0)
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Is There A Water Crisis In the West?
I mean we are always sure of some water to come out of the tap everytime we open it; otherwise there must be a fault in the line. But I bin thinking about, what hapens if it is, some other reason like..... there is no water at the end of the line but air. Hmmmmm.....
We have lots of water been used for non essential services eg. Golf Links. Now take this from the mighty US.
"This notion that we'll have water forever is wrong. California is running out. It's got 20-some years of water. New Mexico has got 10, although they're building golf courses as fast as they can, so maybe they can whittle that down to five. Arizona, Florida, even the Great Lakes now, there's huge new demand."
And in the rest of the world:
"The Nile River doesn't reach its end. The Colorado River, the Yellow River in China, they, for the most part, don't flow anymore to the sea."
Oh! dear me! This is how the boffins put it:
"Scientists, through decades of study and millions and millions of pieces of data, now recognize the fact that we're on the brink of the sixth great mass extinction ever to be experienced on the face of the earth. The fifth mass extinction was the dinosaur age."
I bin thinkin about this climatic change debate; no one talks about water is a factor for climatic changes, I mean the management of water. Well I found this article about a book written by this person; "one of the leading figures in the global water justice movement, Maude Barlow. She is the head of the Council of Canadians, Canada's largest public advocacy group, founder of the Blue Planet Project. Maude Barlow is the author of 16 books -- her latest just came out; it's called Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water -- joining us now in our firehouse studio."
This is what she says:
"Well, I guess the most important thing I want to put out to the world is that we always hear that climate change -- and that is, greenhouse gas-induced climate change -- is affecting water, which is true -- melting glaciers and all of that. But I am, with this book, trying to put a new wrinkle, if you will, into the whole debate. It's kind of -- I call it the inconvenient truth of water. And that is that our abuse, pollution, misplacement, displacement and just mismanagement of water is actually one of the causes of climate change. And it's a really different kind of way of looking at it.
Very simply, Amy, the story is that as we have polluted the world's surface water, we are taking water from the ground, from ground water or from wilderness or from watersheds, and we're moving it where we want it to be, so to water great, big, huge cities that then dump it into the ocean, so don't return it to the watershed, or we pave over what's called water-retentive lands, so we don't have the hydrologic cycle able to fulfill its responsibility and bring water back. We're doing something called virtual water trade, which is where we use our water to grow or produce something that then is exported. In the United States, you export a third of your water, domestic water, every day out of the United States in terms of these exports. You don't have enough water to do that"
I think all these businesses which use water for their industrial work should have their facteries near the sea and either use the salty water or purify it for use. Yes of course the price will go up, but that will stabilise with supply and demand. If it is too expensive then there is no demand, as the punters think of it as a luxury and then, there will be less produced. Take the bloody Caca Cola for instance. They put their facteries in a poor country saying they are doing good by giving the country work. But the down side is they take huge amounts of water - 10 pints of water to a pint of Caca Cola - from the local population and pollute the surface water without due care; and the end product is local kids suffering from multitude of ailments due to the pollutants some cancerous. Caca Cola is not a necessary drink by any standard except the junkies who think it is groovy to be addicted to Caca Cola.
Aieeeeya.... this is something I bin lookin for a long time. Actual sats of bottled water. See this.
"There's also bottled water. We put something like 50 billion gallons of water in plastic bottles around the world last year, dumping those bottles everywhere."
That is another factor for the water been taken away from the place where it came from and dumped...pissed into another area.
"We tested over a thousand bottles of water, over a hundred brands that are sold in the United States, and we found that it is not necessarily any safer or better or purer than your city tap water. We found some of them had arsenic in them at high levels, Some of them had organic chemicals in them, a variety of bacteria. So there were problems with about a third of the brands that we sampled. Some of the water we saw had pictures of mountains on it; it was city tap water. Glacier water came from groundwater in Florida. Some of them said that they were pure mountain. I mean, the list is very long. We found a case in Massachusetts where a guy had sunk a well in an industrial parking lot that was near a superfund site. He was pumping water out of this well and selling it under multiple different brands. So people buying this stuff had no idea where it was coming from."
Getting very interesting init? I mean look at the TV you find all the outside TV presenters drinking from a bottle, looking glamourous and even I felt good drinking from a bottle in public.... oops there you know now.
there is a new idea in the corporate world called Water Recycling!
"Water recycling is either toilet-to-tap recycling of water or desalination. There's many forms water recycling, and it's the big industry. It's the fastest-growing part of the water industry. And this is the cleanup of dirty water.
And my concern -- and the more research I did on this, the more concerned I got -- was that this government, in particular, the United States, but many governments, are putting all their water eggs in the basket of cleaning up dirty water, instead of conservation, instead of protecting water at its source. What they're coming at -- the way they're coming at it now is to clean up water after it's been polluted. And there's huge amounts of money to be made. And my concern is, who's going to control that? Who's going to own the water itself? If Coca-Cola - Caca Cola - can own the water it sells you, why wouldn't General Electric or Suez be able to say, "Well, we own the water that we cleaned up, and we will decide how much money we make, and we will decide how much -- who gets it and who's not going to get it"? So it's very much an issue of control and also control about regulation at the other end."
Things you learn out of this internet system can be your death. Now my heart started pounding really heavy as I read this:
"And this is also true for China. China is on the search for water. It's destroyed its water table so that all the running shoes and toys in the world, and so on, are coming from there, so they've diverted their water from watersheds and from growing green for their people to production. And so, now they're going to build a great big pipeline up to the Tibetan Himalayas. They're going to take the water that belongs to the rivers that feed all of Asia. So if you want to see a water war coming, you keep your eye on that one."
I remember writing to the Chinese and signing world wide petitions objecting to the inhuman activities done by the Chinese, in Tibet. Now this ..... my blood boils. Bummers and stutteres...... Oh well....I created it and I enjoy it....
Now another story I came across is that, "Poisoned dumplings incident reveals fragility of Sino-Japanese relations" and DO NOT EAT CHINESE IMPORTS. THEY CAN POISON YOU
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
We have lots of water been used for non essential services eg. Golf Links. Now take this from the mighty US.
"This notion that we'll have water forever is wrong. California is running out. It's got 20-some years of water. New Mexico has got 10, although they're building golf courses as fast as they can, so maybe they can whittle that down to five. Arizona, Florida, even the Great Lakes now, there's huge new demand."
And in the rest of the world:
"The Nile River doesn't reach its end. The Colorado River, the Yellow River in China, they, for the most part, don't flow anymore to the sea."
Oh! dear me! This is how the boffins put it:
"Scientists, through decades of study and millions and millions of pieces of data, now recognize the fact that we're on the brink of the sixth great mass extinction ever to be experienced on the face of the earth. The fifth mass extinction was the dinosaur age."
I bin thinkin about this climatic change debate; no one talks about water is a factor for climatic changes, I mean the management of water. Well I found this article about a book written by this person; "one of the leading figures in the global water justice movement, Maude Barlow. She is the head of the Council of Canadians, Canada's largest public advocacy group, founder of the Blue Planet Project. Maude Barlow is the author of 16 books -- her latest just came out; it's called Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle for the Right to Water -- joining us now in our firehouse studio."
This is what she says:
"Well, I guess the most important thing I want to put out to the world is that we always hear that climate change -- and that is, greenhouse gas-induced climate change -- is affecting water, which is true -- melting glaciers and all of that. But I am, with this book, trying to put a new wrinkle, if you will, into the whole debate. It's kind of -- I call it the inconvenient truth of water. And that is that our abuse, pollution, misplacement, displacement and just mismanagement of water is actually one of the causes of climate change. And it's a really different kind of way of looking at it.
Very simply, Amy, the story is that as we have polluted the world's surface water, we are taking water from the ground, from ground water or from wilderness or from watersheds, and we're moving it where we want it to be, so to water great, big, huge cities that then dump it into the ocean, so don't return it to the watershed, or we pave over what's called water-retentive lands, so we don't have the hydrologic cycle able to fulfill its responsibility and bring water back. We're doing something called virtual water trade, which is where we use our water to grow or produce something that then is exported. In the United States, you export a third of your water, domestic water, every day out of the United States in terms of these exports. You don't have enough water to do that"
I think all these businesses which use water for their industrial work should have their facteries near the sea and either use the salty water or purify it for use. Yes of course the price will go up, but that will stabilise with supply and demand. If it is too expensive then there is no demand, as the punters think of it as a luxury and then, there will be less produced. Take the bloody Caca Cola for instance. They put their facteries in a poor country saying they are doing good by giving the country work. But the down side is they take huge amounts of water - 10 pints of water to a pint of Caca Cola - from the local population and pollute the surface water without due care; and the end product is local kids suffering from multitude of ailments due to the pollutants some cancerous. Caca Cola is not a necessary drink by any standard except the junkies who think it is groovy to be addicted to Caca Cola.
Aieeeeya.... this is something I bin lookin for a long time. Actual sats of bottled water. See this.
"There's also bottled water. We put something like 50 billion gallons of water in plastic bottles around the world last year, dumping those bottles everywhere."
That is another factor for the water been taken away from the place where it came from and dumped...pissed into another area.
"We tested over a thousand bottles of water, over a hundred brands that are sold in the United States, and we found that it is not necessarily any safer or better or purer than your city tap water. We found some of them had arsenic in them at high levels, Some of them had organic chemicals in them, a variety of bacteria. So there were problems with about a third of the brands that we sampled. Some of the water we saw had pictures of mountains on it; it was city tap water. Glacier water came from groundwater in Florida. Some of them said that they were pure mountain. I mean, the list is very long. We found a case in Massachusetts where a guy had sunk a well in an industrial parking lot that was near a superfund site. He was pumping water out of this well and selling it under multiple different brands. So people buying this stuff had no idea where it was coming from."
Getting very interesting init? I mean look at the TV you find all the outside TV presenters drinking from a bottle, looking glamourous and even I felt good drinking from a bottle in public.... oops there you know now.
there is a new idea in the corporate world called Water Recycling!
"Water recycling is either toilet-to-tap recycling of water or desalination. There's many forms water recycling, and it's the big industry. It's the fastest-growing part of the water industry. And this is the cleanup of dirty water.
And my concern -- and the more research I did on this, the more concerned I got -- was that this government, in particular, the United States, but many governments, are putting all their water eggs in the basket of cleaning up dirty water, instead of conservation, instead of protecting water at its source. What they're coming at -- the way they're coming at it now is to clean up water after it's been polluted. And there's huge amounts of money to be made. And my concern is, who's going to control that? Who's going to own the water itself? If Coca-Cola - Caca Cola - can own the water it sells you, why wouldn't General Electric or Suez be able to say, "Well, we own the water that we cleaned up, and we will decide how much money we make, and we will decide how much -- who gets it and who's not going to get it"? So it's very much an issue of control and also control about regulation at the other end."
Things you learn out of this internet system can be your death. Now my heart started pounding really heavy as I read this:
"And this is also true for China. China is on the search for water. It's destroyed its water table so that all the running shoes and toys in the world, and so on, are coming from there, so they've diverted their water from watersheds and from growing green for their people to production. And so, now they're going to build a great big pipeline up to the Tibetan Himalayas. They're going to take the water that belongs to the rivers that feed all of Asia. So if you want to see a water war coming, you keep your eye on that one."
I remember writing to the Chinese and signing world wide petitions objecting to the inhuman activities done by the Chinese, in Tibet. Now this ..... my blood boils. Bummers and stutteres...... Oh well....I created it and I enjoy it....
Now another story I came across is that, "Poisoned dumplings incident reveals fragility of Sino-Japanese relations" and DO NOT EAT CHINESE IMPORTS. THEY CAN POISON YOU
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)