Digital Being

All living beings are digital. Why?

If I feel thirsty I have a drink. The decision whether to drink or not is either yes or no. There are no if's nor but's. Even if we but a if and a but we have to decide yes or no to put the if or the but. No one can escape this.









I am a selfish person. If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!

My Religion

I am do not have faith in any of the religions in this world. I think all religions started by someone who had revolutionary ideas. After the death of the original person who started it, a gang of power hungry people started it as a religion. Religion is the best way to control people. Every religion wants you to have faith in something outside of yourself. The religion wants you to follow a certain dogma and you lose your own free thinking potentials. As St Ignatius puts it, " Give yourself to God, be like a piece of wood floating in a stream."

So I decided to practice what Buddha, Jesus and Mohamed did. They all went without food. Buddha stayed under a tree eating only one ball of rice for 49 days. Jesus went to the desert and spent 30 days without food. Mohamed did 30 days without food. So what happens when a person go without food. As Maze prison hunger strikers found out, the person halucinates. I did not fancy going without food as I was scared of death. But there are certain drugs I could take to halucinate. Acid, mushrooms etc etc.

After a few religious trips I found out that where ever I am I am there. I cannot escape myself ever. And the realisation of how I came to be. I got rid of the power of other people over me. I am the god of me. That does not mean I am a God who has power over all; but all which affects me. 

Then I concidered the religious explanations of sin, karma etc etc. I found out that the religions make these beliefs to enslave me in a very serious psychological way. If I feel guilty of anything I suffer and that can affect me psychologically more than you can imagine. I have met people who had gone 'mad' due to this. I realise that everytime I do something I do the best at that moment. Only after the event has happened do I realise that I did something wrong. I know I have done certain things in the past, where whilst that event is happening I have doubts. But I carried on doing it. Certain times I had guilty pleasure at that instant. I cried after. I suffered after of guilt. But if I think that I am responsible for all that affects me good or bad, I must give the same way of thinking to other people. When I get hurt by someone I use to put the blame on that person without any thoughts. Now I get angry for a moment and then I take the responcibility for being affected. That way I forgive that person. And forget it. The same way if someoone gets hurt by me while I am about something without any pre-planning, and intent, that person has to take the responsibility of the effect which affected that person. Hopefully if that person thinks like me I will be forgiven and that incidence will be forgotton.

Concider this. Jesus said something like, "He who has no sins cast the stone". This is how it is explained in some Bible study:

The "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone" incident is one of the most well-known lessons of the Bible. A woman, who had been caught in the act of adultery was brought to Jesus Christ by the scribes and Pharisees as a test to see if the Messiah was a liberal in matters of the Law of God. In response to their deceitful query, He didn't condemn the woman, not because He was a liberal, not because He condoned her sin, but because the men who brought the woman to Him were Hypocrites. He was the only person there that day who was free of sin, the only one who had the right to "cast the first stone." He didn't stone her (or her accusers), but instead forgave her and told her to "sin no more." Otherwise, the day is coming when she, if she didn't thereafter repent, won't be stoned, but will be burned - along with the hypocrites who brought her to Him that day, if they didn't thereafter repent of their sin:

Of course he has no sins, not because he is the son of God, but he has found out what sin means. The whole story was twisted to merit what the church says about sin. Look at it this way. He realised that we all have no sins, as I did. As I said; I do what is the best and the right at every event. So if I did a wrong thing in my life I will be doing something else instead of typing this. So every action I took in my life was the right thing at the right time to be here right now.

But when you realise that you cannot do anything to harm anyone. It is easy to talk about it but to live that life it took me more that 20 years. I do not suffer from guilt anymore than a few seconds everytime a cringe thought comes from the past. I live a very religious life. Sometimes I think more than so called religious people. I call this religion Unism as there is a unit which is concerned you the person. As a digital being I am a unit whose beliefs are these.











I am a selfish person. If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!

Brookings Institute

About in it's own website says:

The Brookings Institution is a non profit public policy organization based in Washington, DC. Our mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations that advance three broad goals:

1 Strengthen American democracy;

2 Foster the economic and social welfare, security and opportunity of all Americans; and

3 Secure a more open, safe, prosperous and cooperative international system.

Brookings is proud to be consistently ranked as the most influential, most quoted and most trusted think tank.

But is it true?

In fact, it's a corporate financed imperial tool. It serves wealth and power. It deplores democracy, social welfare, and equal opportunity. It supports Washington's longstanding Syria and Iran regime change agenda. Doing so ignores rule of law principles.

Writes Stephen Lendman about the subject.

And further more I see in this forum:

Take the Brookings Institution. For many years, its senior expert on the Middle East was William B. Quandt, a former National Security Council official with a well-deserved reputation for even-handedness. Today, Brookings’s coverage is conducted through the Saban Center for Middle East Studies, which is financed by Haim Saban, an Israeli-American businessman and ardent Zionist. The centre’s director is the ubiquitous Martin Indyk. What was once a non-partisan policy institute is now part of the pro-Israel chorus.

I am a selfish person. If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!