Click on Pic to enlarge
I watched egyptians coming to the streets and getting the Western puppet out of the kingship applause I reckoned.
Then Lybia erupted. All the Western pundits are shouting for a no fly zone etc. But none of them stopped to check the difference. In Egypt it was a popular uprising, by common people. In Lybia it was generated by the NATO long before and the common people were not inbolved only the puppets of the old king who was deposed by Gadaffi and his clan. You can see it from the start. It was a very few people in Tripoli and most of them went back home when things went a bit tough. There was no passion. Only in Benghazi it is shown to be popular. But I really think there is not many people who are against Gaddaffi, out of the million. Huh wait.
Added: from http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23548
Added From
Added on 26th march.
Now I am very sure about the instigators of this Libyan revolution. It is very complicated like the Afghanistan liberation fron the Soviets.
As usual US and us in UK find the Libyan terrorists and give them safe havens in UK and US. Then we train them and send them back to Libya. Some of them are Al Quaeda operatives from Afghanistan and Bosnia. Its a dangerous game we are playing. If we get rid of Qadaffi and then the opposition leaders who take over can be far more Anti west than Qadaffi himself.
That is a bold statement. As I read the article i began to feel that what I thought at first, of course I bin reading various article; is becoming a reality. I think as I have read it a few times i will leave you to it by
leading you to this:
Added on 7 March:
I read
this one which was published on 19th March. But i was intrigued by the following statement.
There is more. If you have time
read this, but i want to point this fact here for now.
14th April added on.
i think next one I will nadd them first. Hrrrrr grrrrr i dont know. I never did in me long and small life. if you are 10 years old you will say "In me long life". Grrrrrr hrumph and all that when you grow older you start going silly in da head n all. Anyway back to Libya.
Situation there is just as we in the international field would of say, "Stalemate". Viola. we done it. we needed it. why ask the bloody IMF. Damn man do you want me to explain everything. Libya is not in the IMF.
Now I ask you to listen to this my mullahs.
Don't ask me who these people are as you can easily google them. but if you really want to read the full story go
here, my babies.
I Add more on 17 of April 2011:
The
article read here.
Added on 6th June:
The second phace of the invatin is now ready.Remember our Hague going on about increasing the attack until September? And using helicoptors? Now I found the dirt on the subject. (yeah I know no ne reads these; but I just write)
Military Escalation: "Phase Two" of the War on Libya
by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
What is Aircraft supercarrier USS George H W Bush (CVN77) and where is it?
What is The "Saxon Warrior" War Games?
I am a selfish person.
If you cannot find the links in this blog, I have majority of them filed, Email me!
A new phase of the war is unfolding leading to a process of military escalation as well as the eventual landing of US-NATO commandos on Libya's shores.
An unprecedented deployment of naval power in the Mediterranean is occurring.
On June 1st, the member states of the Atlantic Alliance (NATO) meeting in Brussels decided to "renew the mission", namely extend the war on Libya, "for another 90 days to late September".
Since the beginning of the war on March 19, more than 10,000 sorties have been conducted. NATO acknowledges a total of 9036 sorties, including 3443 strike sorties over a two month period, (March 31, 2011-May 31, 2011).
Military operations are no longer limited to a high altitude bombing campaign, where strike targets are "pre-approved" and planned in advance. The deployment of helicopters and low altitude air operations are envisaged. The latter are to support the deployment of US-NATO commandos and rebel forces on the ground.
What is unfolding is an escalation of military operations, which at the same time is leading to a protracted war.
Dear Mr. Medvedev and Vladimir Putin,
You said that citizens of the former Soviet Union were destined to become today citizens of different Slavic CIS countries – Ukraine, Belarus and Russia.
Despite this, we all believe that it is Russia as successor to the USSR, which is our SOLE safeguard for the interests of our countries and the security of our citizens. Therefore, we appeal to you for help and justice.
XU JINGJING: What is your analysis on the U.S. and the military alliance’s actions in the first ten days of the war in Libya?
NAZEMROAYA: The actions in the first ten days of the war were never meant to protect civilians. The military operations have been offensive in nature and a means to weaken Libya as an independent state. I mentioned earlier that I listened to the testimony of Admiral Stavridis to the U.S. Armed Services Committee in Washington and I would like to refer to it again. At the hearing both Admiral Stavridis and Senator McCain both unwittingly stated that sanctions and no-fly zones do not accomplish anything. This is very profound. If these actions do not accomplish anything, then why did the U.S. push for them to be imposed on the Libyans? The answer is that the operation is not of a humanitarian nature, it is an act of aggression meant to open the door into Libya and Africa for a new colonial project.
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya specializes on on the Middle East and Central Asia. He is a Research Associate at the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
There are only 5 nations without a Rothschild model central bank: North Korea, Iran, Sudan, Cuba and Libya.
There were two others: Afghanistan and Iraq, but they were gobbled up by the international banking system within a heartbeat of the invasions.
Whilst many respected oil experts have argued that since so many western energy companies operate in Libya, this is not about oil, there are some points worth pondering. All companies operating in Libya must have Libyan partners, entitled to 35% of profits.(iv) Trading is via the Libyan Central Bank, in the Libyan Dinar, not US$s. The Libyan Central Bank is also independently outside the IMF and the World Bank.
Not only a demonization campaign against the Libyan leader, but every form of fraud and propaganda is being used to push for this intervention, including a supposed "vote" by the Arab League supporting the latest U.N. resolution. Left unsaid is the fact that only 11 of the 22 members of the League even attended the meeting, which was held behind closed doors. Two of these 11 attending members, Syria and Algeria, made clear that they were completely opposed to military intervention in Libya.
I. Who Are the Libyan Opposition
1) Historically:
"If Muammar Al Gaddafi behaved paranoid, it was for good reason. It wasn't long after he reached the age of 27 and led a small group of junior military officers in a bloodless coup d'état against Libyan King Idris on September 1, 1969, that threats to his power and life emerged - from monarchists, Israeli Mossad, Palestinian disaffections, Saudi security, the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (NFSL), the National Conference for the Libyan Opposition (NCLO), British intelligence, United States antagonism and, in 1995, the most serious of all, Al Qaeda-like Libyan Islamic fighting group, known as Al-Jama'a al-Islamiyyah al-Muqatilah bi-Libya. The Colonel reacted brutally, by either expelling or killing those he feared were against him."3
The world is facing a very unpredictable and potentially dangerous situation in North Africa and the Middle East. What began as a memorable, promising, relatively nonviolent achievement of New Politics - the Revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt - has morphed very swiftly into a recrudescence of old habits: America, already mired in two decade-long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and sporadic air attacks in Yemen and Somalia, now, bombing yet another Third World Country, in this case Libya.
Largest Military Undertaking since the Invasion of Iraq
A military operation of this size and magnitude, involving the active participation of several NATO member and partner countries is never improvised. Operation Odyssey Dawn was in the advanced stages of military planning prior to the protest movement in Egypt and Tunisia.
Public opinion was led to believe that the protest movement had spread spontaneously from Tunisia and Egypt to Libya.
The armed insurgency in Eastern Libya is directly supported by foreign powers. Rebel forces in Benghazi immediately hoisted the red, black and green banner with the crescent and star: the flag of the monarchy of King Idris, which symbolized the rule of the former colonial powers. (See Manlio Dinucci, Libya-When historical memory is erased, Global Research, February 28, 2011)
The insurrection was also planned and coordinated with the timing of the military operation. It had been carefully planned months ahead of the protest movement, as part of a covert operation.
US, British special forces were reported to be on the ground "helping the opposition" right from the outset.
What we are dealing with is a military roadmap, a timeline of carefully planned military and intelligence events.
The real objective of "Operation Libya" is not to establish democracy but to take possession of Libya's oil reserves, destabilize the National Oil Corporation (NOC) and eventually privatize the country's oil industry, namely transfer the control and ownership of Libya's oil wealth into foreign hands. The National Oil Corporation (NOC) is ranked 25 among the world’s Top 100 Oil Companies. (The Energy Intelligence ranks NOC 25 among the world’s Top 100 companies. - Libyaonline.com (http://www.libyaonline.com/business/details.php?id=17260))
